I happened to read the article in SOM dated 1st dec 2005, convenor of ACICM stating that the City Corporation can make 1808 cr.
First of all, No one is sure what the convenor has in mind towards the development of Mysore City. The statement "Let the People of Mysore decide between Rs. 220 Cr. for 40 years and Rs. 1,808.16 Cr. for 40 years".
If the corporation has decided to give the property on lease for 40 years, it is a lease of land.. not sale of land.. god know how much the value of the property would be 40 years from now.. after all the development from Marverick Company. One can imagine the kind of employment generation that the project would do.. the amount of revenue to be generated by having such a mall.. from a skilled labour to a newspaper they would be benefitted by the project of a shopping mall.. If the corporation deposits the money in the bank who would benefit? Even if the corporation decides to sell the property, who is going to buy at such a huge cost? and even if the corporation identifies a buyer to buy that property, accordingly that buyer will not be allowed to construct any commercial complex within 300 feet from the heritage structure. ACICM will surely go to the court in order to stop the work. So what does the buyer do? Hang himself? or gift the property?
ACICM urges the civic body to turns its attention to drinking water supply, redeeming the stom water drains of obstructions, garbage clearance, upkeep of roads, solving the pig menance and many others.. But instead of urging the civic body ACICM can take up road shows try to educate public in any one of the problems mentioned here.. That would help the people of mysore..
Why hasn't the ACICM approached the court to stop the construction of an annex court comples going on at the Court Complex next to the Zilla Panchayat? A rule is a rule but we need to keep up with the changing trends!!
Development activity is a must in Mysore, infact I hope the corporation should start collecting parking fees at all the parking bays in the City. Atleast this would ensure proper parking of the vehicles on the roads.. The revenue generated can be self sustaining to provide employment to unemployed youth in the District.
ACICM should concentrate on coordinating with the concerned departments to provide better facilities ..
We need to THINK BIG!! AIM FOR BETTER!! ACCOMPLISH THE IMPOSSIBLE!!
That spirited note of yours, Suresh, ought to set some of us thinking; about what this fuss is all about. The proposed commercial complex, says ‘The Hindu’ (Dec.2, 2005), will have 155 shops, a multiplex, entertainment zone, food court, and basement parking lot to hold 650 vehicles. An earlier report, in April last, spoke of a complex with 800 shops and 1000-vehicle parking space. Can we rule out further squeeze on the much-needed car-park space by the time the project gets moving?
It was also reported that Makkaji Chowk project had been under consideration for the last 40 years. Has anyone spared a thought for the revenue loss during this period? Our concerned citizens would do well to think of this before moving the court. Incidentally, it was litigation that had held up the project for decades. And fresh litigation ‘in public interest’ would set us back by years.
Still on ‘thinking’ mode ( are you reading, Mr Yerapathi ?), it occurred to me that public interest would be better served if we, as concerned citizens, find ways to further projects, rather than to hold them up. Nit-picking is needed, but shouldn’t become our full-time preoccupation. Anyone can get into a ‘protest’ mode, notably, the ones that have no responsibility for implementing schemes.
Thought – 3: It is nobody’s case that our public interest watch-dog agencies should put up with corruption and shoddy implementation. However, in many cases, public interest is better served by co-operating with project enforcement agencies; and, more significantly, encouraging them on occasions. Can anyone think of the last occasion when our activist groups patted the police/municipal commissioner for a good work done?
Thought – 4: Those concerned with traffic de-congestion issue could consider Mr Bapu Satyanarayana’s suggestion for creating a vehicle-free zone on Sayyaji Rao Rd., and developing it into a pedestrian plaza in front of a renovated Devaraja Market.
Thought – 5: Wouldn’t we want our ‘informed’ citizens focusing their concern on long pending issues such as Mysore-Bangalore rail double track, the four-lane highway and lobbying for IISc campus in Mysore ?
Mr. Krishnan, there are thousand and odd things that we as concerned citizens of Mysore City can do, and not to mention there are a few people doing their bit for betterment of the society.
The concerned citizens should be calling themselves as a reformer or as an volunteer but not as an activist.. Once you get on the attitude of being an activist, you normally get on to the protesting mode!! yeah if you start working towards a solution to a problem then you will be a reformer.. I think its all in the thought process & attitude!!
Personally I would want Mysore City to match Bangalore's City growth.. but not like hapazard growth but a systematic, scientific & economic growth..
A few things that I would always want to do in Mysore City, which I can accomplish is that a good english movie, or buy a good novel to read, eat thai food, etc.,
One literally has to search or visit Bangalore to accomplish the above. coming back to topic of Makaji Chowk area, and the company which has been awarded the tender, they are into the same business of setting shopping malls and other leisure activities. Give them an opportunity and they are not foolish to come and invest huge money on this project.