Jaganmohan Palace played host to a Bharatanatyam ballet on Draupadi Shapatham or Draupadi's Vow (not Draupadi's Oath as announced in the publicity material by the organizers) this evening. It was a good presentation of the Mahabharatha episode, but the ugly aspect of the programme was that it started about an hour behind schedule. Delayed starts have become common, but at least our cultural troupes must set a trend by being punctual. Only recently Gangubai Hangal was humiliated a second time by the state government. This after she had made known her displeasure known for being shown disrespect last year. Our politicians are incorrigible, no doubt, but what about our artistes? They must refuse to attend functions where politicians are invited. If artistes cannot do it, nobody else can.
In the present instance, the auditorium had about 30 people at the scheduled start. Unmindful of it, the organizers (Bramha Vidya Trust) should have started the programme on time. That was one way of respecting both the audience and themselves.
Mysore is a hearitage city where many of us live by calender, not the clock. One of my early posts on this site pertained to our glaring indifference to punctuality. To read more...click on 'Why this contempt for the clock?'
I totally agree with Vijendra. No organizers should punish those who have come on time by waiting for others. We need a movement in Mysore to "impose" on all the organizers to start every function on time through moral persuation. Those who go on time should ask the organizers why they are punishing them for coming on time when they wait either for the audience or usually for VIPs. One of the VIPs who is always on time is JSS swamiji. Let us make Mysore a city where every function on time. Should this be our "vision" statement for JNURM? I am just joking. Perhaps not.
GVK has made a pertinent point on the need for launching a civic crusade on punctuality on the Ecuador lines. Time management, I feel, is essentially mind management. We are given to all sorts of distractions because of which we lose sight of priorities. (I am attempting a book on this).
In the Indian context, the colossal abuse of time is an extension of our feudal past. In fact, we have never broken off from the past; it is a feudal present, as well. Consider this. A minister keeps thousands of people waiting not because his car had a mechanical breakdown but he is nursing a hangover. Then, when he is above to leave, his party functionaries call on him (needless to say, unannounced), and he wants to keep them in good humour because they are more needed. Half an hour is spent with them talking local politics. The functionaries are happy to have spent so much time with the big man. 'Brother has a wonderful personality, he has no airs about him.'
When Brother finally arrives two unbroken hours late at the venue of the function, he is greeted with applause, even a standing ovation. He does not even feel the need to apologize. If he has felt, he still does not say sorry because he thinks that the audience is unmindful of the delay and has expressed the same with its cheer. The audience, the bureaucracy, the police nobody feels anything about the insult, because there is no insult felt in the first place. The insult of their time being flagrantly encroahed upon.
The media is also becoming less and less critical of the netas for not respecting its time. Reporters spend sizeable time of their lives waiting for habitual time-violating politicians. Whether their patience goes unrewarded or not, particularly in these days when journalism is losing its characteristic stridency, is a moot question. However, even a couple of reporters that may refuse to entertain late-coming politicians cannot always do so because their editors don't approve of such dissidence either because of their own equations with the late-comers or out of an understandable anxiety that their publication might miss something important. (In either case, there is a commercial interest!)
GVK might want to throw light on this by sharing what he himself did, say, during his Delhi days when a bigwig came late to a function/press conference.
Late-coming is also a status symbol for many. The duration for which their audience has to wait for their arrival is in direct proportion to their position/self-importance.
There is so much to be written about this subject (hence the book idea). I will cut it short to say that time management has to do with disciplining oneself and starting to respect oneself (which automatically means respecting the man for whom one has given time). Finally, it has to do with achieving higher productivity and prosperity.
The media is also becoming less and less critical of the netas for not respecting its time. Reporters spend sizeable time of their lives waiting for habitual time-violating politicians...... GVK might want to throw light on this by sharing what he himself did, say, during his Delhi days when a bigwig came late to a function/press conference.
Hanging out for a VIP to show up at public function/press meet has been an occupational routine for the media . My Delhi days were not much different. Snag was you couldn't usually get the entire media to stage a walk-out in protest against a late-coming busybody. For media included news agencies (obliged to report VIPs however late they turned up) AIR/Doordarshan that couldn't afford to displease Netas; and small newspapers whose owners wouldn't want their reporters giving cause for complaint from VIPs or event orgnisers. The odd reporters, mainly from big dailies or outstation papers, who made noise at VIP late-comings rarely did much else.
However, I can recall two occasions, in my experience as Times of India Correspondent at Bhopal (early 80s), when the media acted in solidarity. The first was a visit by the then union home minister, Mr Buta Singh. He was to address a crucial press meet, but took his time coming, leaving us reporters fretting and fuming. And then we decided that we must convey our displeasure to the minister. When Mr Buta Singh turned up, eventually, we waited till he settled down. Before he started to read out a statement (to be followed by Q & A) one of us stood up and told the home minister that we waited for him for well over an hour, only to convey our displeasure. After this the entire media walked out of the room, leaving Mr Buta Singh and senior officials wondering what hit them. Our solidarity was such that even AIR/DD man walked out with us. The boycott even made the evening news. It was quite another matter that Doordarshan was later summoned by officals to record Mr Buta Singh's statement for broadcast in DD News.
The second incident involved a Bhopal visit of Mr N D Tiwari, then union industry minister. BHEL, Bhopal, had lined up a luncheon press meet. After a wait of half-hour we told the organisers we were leaving. They pleaded with us, saying that the minister had been held up at the BHEL township school and had (Mr Tiwari) sent word that he would be with us in another 15 minutes. We said, 'nothing doing', and staged a walk out. Nearly two hours later I got a call from Mr Tiwari, conveying his apology to the media. He noted the delay was caused by a last minute requst by BHEL management to visit the township school on way to the press lunch. Mr Tiwari asked me to convey his personal apology to all other members of the media, regreting his inablility to phone them individually, as he was speaking to me from the airport (on his way back to New Delhi).
Thanks for sharing your experiences. I think the responses of the two ministers to the boycotts are typical of the two personalities (as the two most recent developments involving them have demonstrated). Buta Singh and N.D. Tiwari have stepped down from their positions in such contrasting styles. (Incidentally, I had the privilege of interviewing the latter - it was a delight doing so).
We, in Mysore, tried enforcing time-consciousness on leaders, but, some reporters would convert such boycotts to their advantage and end up with "exclusive" interviews. So much so, some of those who boycotted would end up covering the "press conference" with borrowed material (!) I envy the solidarity (read decency) that you enjoyed during your Bhopal days.